The intelligence layer.
Patent enforcement runs on information. We built the infrastructure that connects all of it.
Fragmented tools
Each tool sees one part of the picture. None of them talk to each other. You pay for five subscriptions and still do the integration yourself.
We connected everything
Data from Google Patents, USPTO, EPO, national offices, CourtListener, and 30+ additional sources. Updated daily.
Relationships
Which patents were litigated, and what happened
Which judges presided, and how they ruled
How each attorney performs with each judge
Which firms win in which courts
Settlement, trial, dismissal, and damages awarded
Connected patents across all jurisdictions
What the platform does
Target Intelligence
Who to enforce against, in what order, and why. Litigation history, counsel track record, settlement patterns, vulnerability timing.
Damages Intelligence
What the patent is worth against each target. Seven independent valuation methods that cross-check each other.
Outcome Prediction
What will happen if you file. Models trained on 8M+ historical cases predict settlement probability, dismissal risk, expected damages, and duration.
Strategic Monitoring
What your targets are facing right now. Continuous tracking of litigation, verdicts, settlements, and regulatory actions.
Campaign Strategy
How to sequence enforcement, when to move, when to wait. Each action improves the position for the next.
Questions you can ask
Not a search bar. A system that reasons about the structure of patents, litigation, and enforcement strategy.
A legal database returns 50 cases about SEPs.
The platform tells you: if you enforce patent X against company Y in court Z, the most likely path is a Markman hearing at month 8, settlement negotiation at month 14, with 63% probability of settlement between $2M–$8M — but only if you file the MSJ early, because 82% of high-value settlements in this judge's history include an early MSJ.
Structure, not just search. Prediction, not just retrieval.
What this replaces
Manual prior art searches at £500-2,000 each
200M+ patents searchable by technology, claims, and citation network
Expert reports at £50-100K per engagement
Economic models producing analytical groundwork for expert testimony
Guesswork on settlement value
Damages estimates cross-checked seven ways with comparable verdicts tracked automatically
Reactive strategy checked ad hoc
Continuous monitoring of cases, verdicts, settlements, regulatory actions
Law firms researching defendants at hourly rates
Every target's litigation history, counsel, and behaviour patterns already mapped
Static claim charts produced once
Claim-to-product mappings updated as products and prior art evolve
Run it on your patents.
Tell us the portfolio, the targets, or the question. We'll show you what the graph sees.
Book a Call